May 18, 2025 · 6 min read · By Faina Shpund
Why most founder coaching is the wrong shape for solo founders
A lot of founder coaching was designed for a founder who doesn't exist in solo land. The default model assumes you have a team, a regular cadence, time blocked for coaching sessions, and the kind of company shape where pulling away for a weekly hour-long call to talk about leadership is a reasonable use of time. Solo founders don't have any of that, and trying to fit a solo founder into the default shape is why so many of them try coaching once, get nothing out of it, and conclude they don't need help.
The first mismatch is the calendar. A weekly hour-long session is a heavy commitment when your week is already 80 percent context-switching between building, talking to customers, and doing whatever administrative work you can't avoid. The session itself takes an hour. The preparation takes another. The recovery from a deep mode-switch out of building takes more. For one hour of coaching you spend two and a half hours of total time, and you have to do it every week whether or not you have a question that week. Fewer calls, focused on the work, fit better.
The second mismatch is the format. A lot of coaching is structured around asking you questions to help you find your own answers. That's the right format when you have enough operating experience to actually have an answer in there somewhere. For a first-time founder making product decisions they have never made before, the questions go nowhere. There's no answer to surface, because the founder has never been in this situation before. They need someone to tell them, with context, what the options actually look like.
The third mismatch is the topic. Coaching often focuses on the founder as a person. Leadership, mindset, communication, time management. These topics matter. They're almost never the thing keeping a solo founder stuck. What's keeping them stuck is a specific product decision, a customer conversation they can't read, a launch that went quiet, a feature they can't decide whether to cut. The thing they need help with is the work itself.
The shape that fits is time with someone who has operating experience, spent on the work in front of you, with a low cost of asking in between. A call every two weeks is enough to go through your customer conversations and decisions without eating your week, and the questions that come up between calls get answered in writing within hours. That's why The Practice keeps calls to every two weeks and puts the rest in Slack.
If you want to see how I work with founders on this, read about founder coaching or startup coaching for early founders.
Related notes
Want help with this?
The Practice is a 3 month, 1:1 program for founders building software or service-based businesses. We'll find a problem people already spend time or money coping with, validate it, and define the MVP, with biweekly calls and Slack access between calls.