← All notes

    December 8, 2024 · 6 min read · By Faina Shpund

    The job of the first 30 days after launch isn't what you think

    Founders treat launch like a finish line. The thing is built, it's live, the work shifts from making to selling. That framing is wrong, and it's wrong in a way that costs more than almost any other early misconception. Launch isn't the end of building. It's the start of the most concentrated learning window you'll ever have, and the job of the first 30 days is to extract as much information from that window as possible before it closes.

    It closes faster than you think. The people who try your product in the first week aren't the people who try it in week eight. Early users are more forgiving, more curious, more willing to give you direct feedback, more interested in talking to the founder. Their behavior in the product, their messages, their hesitations and their delights are the cleanest data you'll ever get about whether the thing works. After 30 days, that audience shifts. Later users will be more demanding, less communicative, and more affected by how other users described the product. The early window is the only window where you get unfiltered signal at scale.

    The job in those 30 days isn't to scale, not to add features, not to chase growth. The job is to watch. Watch where people drop off. Watch what they ignore. Watch what they ask you about that you thought was obvious. Watch which people come back without prompting and which ones never do. Talk to as many of them as you can. Ask them what they thought you did, not what they thought of what you did. The gap between the two is where most early products go wrong.

    Founders who use the first 30 days well come out of it with a clear picture of which slice of their audience the product actually serves, what the one or two things are that make those people come back, and where the product is failing in ways the founder couldn't have predicted. Founders who use the first 30 days poorly come out of it with vanity metrics and a vague sense that the launch went fine.

    Treat the launch window like the experiment it is. The product isn't the thing being tested. The fit between the product and a specific kind of person is. Run the experiment carefully and you'll know things in five weeks that founders without that discipline still don't know after five months.

    This connects to a question I answer in depth: Why does my product have no users after launch and Why do people say they like my idea but don't buy.

    Want help with this?

    The Practice is a 3 month, 1:1 program for founders building software or service-based businesses. We'll find a problem people already spend time or money coping with, validate it, and define the MVP, with biweekly calls and Slack access between calls.

    In Your Corner, the weekly email

    A short weekly email from me. One question to think about, one decision to make this week, and what I'm seeing across founder conversations. Shorter and more personal than the Notes essays, made for your inbox. Free.